Systemsvale website audit

Ourwebsite,audited

The checks behind our own live public website, with dated coverage and verified results you can inspect. The address and capture time below identify the version reviewed.

Tested address: https://www.systemsvale.com
Capture started

Use your browser's Print command to save this report as a PDF.

Download verified checks JSON ↓
WEBSITE REVIEW
Public website review

Systemsvale: the checks behind this website.

Our own websiteLive public websiteCaptured 14 October 2026 at 19:42 IST
1 · Summary

What this capture covers

We checked 79 public routes, recording 79 desktop visits and 79 mobile visits. This report presents the verified checks from that dated snapshot.

158 viewport visits completed. The scope is the public website; dashboard and account work are separate.

2 · Coverage

The work behind the checks

Public routes checkedDistinct public routes in this dated capture.79
Internal destinations checkedRecorded internal paths, queries and anchors.320
Desktop accessibility scansCompleted automated rule scans with reduced motion.79
Image checksViewport visits with loaded-image checks.158
Layout checksViewport visits checked for horizontal overflow.158
Browser execution checksCompleted visits observed for uncaught page errors.158

These are coverage counts, tied to the recorded version and settings. Automated accessibility scans ran on desktop with reduced motion; they record selected rule coverage rather than a certification.

3 · Verified checks

What we verified

Public routes and linksCheck 1

Working public destinations

158 of 158 recorded page responses were successful. 320 of 320 internal destinations were verified, including requested HTML anchors.

Evidence
The download lists verified page checks and internal destinations from this capture.
Scope
Recorded public routes, internal paths, queries, anchors and followed same-site redirects.
Quality process
Repeat important journeys after meaningful changes and review external destinations separately.
Automated rule coverageCheck 2

Accessibility checks with a defined scope

79 desktop automated accessibility scans completed on the captured website. The published count records completed scans of selected rules.

Tool and settings
axe-core 4.13.0, selected WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 A/AA rules, desktop viewport, reduced motion and scrolled page content.
Review approach
Automated rules sit alongside keyboard, screen-reader and normal-motion checks in the quality process.
Scope
Results apply to the captured state. A completed automated scan is not a WCAG conformance certification or verification of every interaction state.
Two viewport sizesCheck 3

Images, layout and browser execution

Loaded-image checks were verified in 158 of 158 visits, horizontal-layout checks in 158 of 158, and browser execution without uncaught page errors in 158 of 158.

Viewports
Desktop 1440 × 1000; mobile 390 × 844 CSS pixels.
What was observed
Loaded-image state, document width and uncaught page errors after hydration, fonts and lazy images were awaited.
Scope
Browser viewport emulation at the recorded sizes. Device, browser and interaction coverage are defined separately for each review.
Page metadataCheck 4

Titles, descriptions and headings

158 of 158 recorded visits verified the presence of a title, description, canonical URL and exactly one H1.

Evidence
Each page record identifies the metadata-presence checks verified in the captured state.
Scope
Presence and heading count are checked here. Editorial quality, canonical-host preference, search indexing and shared-link presentation have their own review.
Quality process
Recheck important landing pages and their shared-link presentation when content or metadata changes.
Separate form evidenceCheck 5

Enquiries: automated checks and owner confirmation

Separate automated form tests exercised validation, accepted and rejected responses, retained drafts and disabled-script fallbacks using mocked delivery. On 14 October 2026, the owner also confirmed that a manual form test worked.

What was verified
Application behaviour under the tested responses, plus owner-reported success of a manual test.
Delivery evidence
Manual success is owner-confirmed. Automated delivery responses were mocked; Gmail receipt was not independently observed in those tests.
For visitors
A form confirmation describes delivery-service acceptance. The privacy notice explains providers and retention; email contact remains available if a form fails.
4 · Quality process

How we keep checking

A dated report belongs to the version tested. These activities guide verification as the website changes.

OrderActivityWhenMethod
01Verify public journeysAfter meaningful changesCheck important links, policies, forms and assets on the updated live website.
02Review accessibilityAcross representative journeysCombine automated rules with normal-motion, keyboard and screen-reader review.
03Observe usabilityAs journeys evolveAgree relevant visitor tasks and observe what supports successful completion.
04Measure mobile performanceAfter performance updatesRepeat live mobile tests with recorded settings; add real-visitor field data when available.
05Publish verified checksAfter live verificationRefresh this dated record so the published coverage reflects the version tested.
5 · Method and scope

How to read the verified checks

Tested version

Live public website at https://www.systemsvale.com. Capture started 14 October 2026 at 19:42 IST.

Browser and settings

Chrome 155.0.8059.79 Reduced motion: enabled. Viewport sizes are listed in Check 3.

Included

Curated coverage and verified checks from the captured public website Public marketing pages and the website audit report at desktop and mobile widths Desktop automated WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 A/AA checks Distinct internal destinations and HTML anchors, including public downloads and the report destination

Scope boundaries

Dashboard, workspace, sign-in, onboarding and APIs External destination validation, live form submission and inbox delivery Performance, Lighthouse scores, production traffic, security and legal compliance Detailed diagnostic findings, retained in the internal quality log

The download is a curated record of coverage and verified checks. Detailed diagnostics stay in the internal quality log. Functional observations, performance measurements and customer outcomes are distinct forms of evidence.

  • This download publishes coverage and verified checks from a dated snapshot. Detailed diagnostic findings are retained in the internal quality log; this is not a complete diagnostic export.
  • The timestamp marks the start of the capture. The report page was checked as deployed at that time, before this new snapshot was published.
  • Desktop accessibility scan counts record completed runs of selected WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 A/AA rules with reduced motion, after scrolling. They do not certify WCAG conformance or verify every interaction state.
  • Page records list checks that ran and their verified subset. The destination list contains verified internal destinations; the summary records all attempted destinations. Broken-link totals are published only when all destination checks are determinate.
  • HTTP verification accepts successful or redirect responses. Metadata verification checks presence and exactly one H1; editorial quality, canonical-host preference and indexing are separate reviews.
  • Images, document width and browser errors were observed at the recorded desktop and mobile viewport sizes after hydration, fonts and lazy images were awaited.
  • Two concurrent workers perform functional checks only. This artifact contains no speed, Lighthouse, traffic, business-outcome or security score.
  • The public navigation uses an isolated signed-out fixture. Private APIs, external requests and message submission are excluded; automated form-delivery responses were tested separately with mocks.

Download verified checks JSON. To discuss the work, contact Systemsvale.

Ready to explore?

Discuss your project →